Check whether the report belongs to the candidate
Match the VIN, mileage, test date and battery identification where available to the vehicle being offered. Record who performed the test and which diagnostic system produced the output. A report from an earlier inspection may predate storage, repairs or further use. If a pack has been replaced, require documentation connecting the replacement to the car. Do not treat a spreadsheet typed by the seller as a diagnostic export unless the underlying record and measurement method are supplied.
Ask what the reported percentage represents
Find out whether the value is a manufacturer diagnostic estimate, a third-party calculation or a measured usable-energy result. Those methods answer different questions and may not be directly comparable. Request the definition, units and any stated uncertainty. A rounded number without a method should carry little weight in the purchase decision. Avoid inventing a universal pass threshold for every Atto 3 generation, battery version and diagnostic tool; the workshop should explain the appropriate interpretation for the particular battery system.
Preserve the conditions surrounding the measurement
Useful records include charge level, battery temperatures, rest or driving state and recent charging activity. Values recorded during charging cannot simply be compared with values recorded after a long rest. Ask the technician to explain unusual cell-group readings under the applicable procedure, not to diagnose a module from a single screenshot. Do not request unsafe discharge experiments or opening the high-voltage enclosure. A controlled assessment belongs with qualified personnel using suitable equipment and the correct service information.
Read the fault history as well as the summary
A clean summary screen may hide incomplete coverage or recently cleared records. Request relevant stored and current faults, their status, available event context and any repair explanation. Low-voltage problems can complicate interpretation, but should not automatically excuse every traction-system warning. Review the separate 12V and storage checks when the vehicle has been standing. A credible report distinguishes faults investigated, faults repaired and items still unresolved rather than calling every cleared code a completed repair.
Connect electronic data with physical evidence
Diagnostics do not replace an inspection of the enclosure, mounts, protective panels and cooling system. Correlate the report with the battery underbody inspection and accident records. A normal estimated capacity does not certify a damaged enclosure. Conversely, a visible scrape needs competent classification rather than automatic assumptions about internal damage. Require clear photographs and a written severity assessment, especially when the car has recently been lifted, transported or repaired underneath.
Compare cars on a consistent basis
For two candidates, use comparable tools, procedures and reporting dates where possible. Put missing information beside the price difference rather than silently treating it as satisfactory. Consider whether repeat testing can resolve the uncertainty before payment. A higher mileage vehicle with coherent records may be easier to evaluate than a low-mileage vehicle with an unexplained battery replacement. This is not a reason to prefer mileage; it is a reason to compare evidence quality explicitly.
Agree what must be resolved before acceptance
List the outstanding questions and assign each to the seller, inspector or destination specialist. State whether the contract requires a fresh test, a repaired item with retest evidence or rejection of a particular condition. Keep warranty eligibility separate from the technical assessment because regional coverage may differ. After arrival, preserve the pre-shipment file and record any new warning promptly. Do not wait until a dispute to ask which car, battery and test conditions the original report described.
Example: two different health reports
One candidate has a high percentage on an undated screenshot; another has a complete, recent report with test conditions and an enclosure inspection. Request equivalent evidence for the first car before comparing the numbers. If the seller cannot supply it, record that evidence gap explicitly rather than deciding that the larger displayed percentage makes the first car the safer purchase.
Buyer checklist
- Match VIN, pack identity, date and mileage.
- Distinguish charge level, health estimate and measured energy.
- Retain fault context and measurement conditions.
- Pair the report with underbody and repair evidence.
Questions and answers
Is a high health percentage enough to buy?
No. You still need a credible method, matching identity, fault review and physical inspection. One figure does not certify the enclosure, cooling system or future reliability.
Can I compare percentages from different scanners?
Not automatically. Ask how each value is generated and interpreted. Different methods and conditions can produce figures that look comparable but are not.
Reference information
Use the applicable market and year documentation for equipment and operating limits. The references have their own market and publication scope; they do not establish the condition, fitted equipment or destination approval of an individual vehicle.
Continue with the Atto 3 battery health guide, or send your vehicle requirements.
